AI Helps Whittle Down Candidates For Hydrogen Carriers In Liquid Form From Billions To About 40
Energy
The sun is essentially an enormous ball of mostly hydrogen gas, releasing energy in the form that warms the Earth and the rest of our solar system. Because of its energy content and abundance, hydrogen shows great promise as an energy source on Earth as well. It could be fueling cars, trucks, buses, trains and ships and generating electricity for consumers. While the sun’s energy comes from the fusion of hydrogen atoms, the process the team aims to use on Earth involves the combustion of hydrogen.
Hydrogen in its pure form exists as a gas under normal conditions. For use as a fuel, one of the challenges is shipping this gas safely to refueling stations and storing it. Hydrogen carrier compounds in liquid form, however, have several advantages. They have a much better safety profile because they are not as prone to leaking and explosion. They also have a much higher energy content per unit volume, making storage and transportation far easier.
The most visible form of a liquid hydrogen carrier compound is water — two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen. Another form is organic molecules, essentially an endless number of possible combinations of hydrogen and carbon atoms, in addition to other atoms such as nitrogen and oxygen.
Among the billions of possible liquid hydrogen carriers, common examples include chemicals like ammonia and methanol. However, the relatively few candidates tested in the laboratory to date have suffered from chemical instability and unwanted side reactions.
The team screened the candidate molecules based on four factors. One was structural similarity to known liquid hydrogen carriers. Another was desirable physical properties, such as melting and boiling points — the liquid must stay liquid when the hydrogen has been added or extracted. Third is that the liquid must be able to store a large amount of hydrogen per unit volume. Finally, the amount of energy needed to release the hydrogen from the liquid must be low enough.
The team’s calculations necessitated access to supercomputers available at few places in the world. One of them is Argonne, home to the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, a DOE Office of Science user facility. The team also relied on Bebop, a computing cluster operated by the Laboratory Computing Resource Center at Argonne.
Even with these powerful resources available, if one allots one millisecond of compute time per molecule, that translates into five years of compute time for 160 billion molecules. For that reason, the team developed an AI-based screening approach that sped up the computations to three million molecules per second, or about 14 hours for the 160 billion.
By their unique approach, the team whittled down the candidates from over 160 billion to a mere 41. Now, the task passes into the hands of experimentalists to test the promising ones. The team’s computational approach paves the way for a new era of innovation in sustainable energy solutions.
This research appeared in Digital Discovery. In addition to Assary, Elliott, Ward and Harb, authors include Ian Foster, Stephen Klippenstein and Larry Curtiss. This research was supported by Laboratory Directed Research and Development funding from Argonne.